Declarations
Where I stand.
said what I said.

My name is Juno/Jun. A 36 years old Gremlin located in Southeast Asia. To be clear, I am not a professional programmer or some kind of AI expert. I am just an ordinary person with no formal background in this field. I am very passionate about making AI characters feel more alive, and everything I share comes from my own long journey of learning, testing, and a lot of trial and error.

I like to understand things from the ground up, to see what makes these models tick and what makes them break. For me, there is no "secret sauce" or magic trick. There is only the slow process of figuring things out.

I do my best to help with questions. It can be a lot sometimes, and I might sigh for a moment, because this technology can be very confusing for all of us. All I ask is that you try to find the answer in those guides first, many people have shared their valuable perspectives about how LLMs act and what you can do as a user.

So don't see me as someone expert in the field. What I say is not the final truth. I don't think anyone is 100% right in a field that changes so quickly. This is just my personal experience, and what I have found works for me, and I hope it can help you too.

PS: Again, I'm not a programmer, an AI expert, a teacher, or a guru. I am, very simply, a control freak. I have an impulse to manage everything. My only 'training' for this comes from writing fanfiction and sapphic/yuri novels back in my younger and more naive days. I learn from everyone in this community: from talented prompt writers, and even from the everyday rants and complaints I see from users on Reddit. So, a huge thank you to everyone who shares their work, and also to everyone who asks questions. There is no such thing as a stupid question, so don't be afraid to ask. (But of course, do your homework first before asking lol)

The most important thing we all have to remember is that Custom Prompts, Lorebooks, Scripts, even the rules creators write in their own bot definition are not magic. The real core of the experience is the Large Language Model (LLM) itself. Everything we build on top of it is just a patch, a helper. My work is to treat the symptoms, not the root cause (治标不治本). The root cause is that the LLM is not human, and we cannot really "fix" that with a prompt.

So my goal as a creator is to be responsible and try my best. It feels irresponsible to me to just say "well, the LLM is flawed, nothing I can do." So I build these scripts to improve our chances. If a problem happens often, and my script can make it happen less often, I see that as a win. We are trying to make our "luck" better when we interact with the AI, but there is still luck involved.

And please, be aware that this technology changes all the time. A model update from DeepSeek can make our best work suddenly feel broken. What works perfectly today might have problems tomorrow. This is just the reality we have to accept.

PS: Light or Heavy tokens in custom prompt or a bot's character definition is not a thing to argue about, there's no wrong or correct on the surface about it. The problem is how the tokens is use. Is it use effectively, or it's heavy tokens is because the writer use a lot of emoji, symbols etc.

A simple example: You see a wallet that's thick as hell, and you think, "Damn, that's a lot of cash." But when it opens, it's just stuffed with a hundred single one-dollar bills. Then you see another wallet, super thin, and you think, "Meh, nothing in there." But when it opens, tucked inside are twenty crisp, hundred-dollar bills.
stance.ai-usage · 2026
On AI usage.
If you're looking for bots entirely hand-written with zero LLM involvement; leave now. I use LLMs and AI-driven tools heavily, because of how I work. They are my aid, my mirror. GIGO principle: garbage in, garbage out. If I suck, doing everything with AI means I still suck. They save my energy so I can focus and amplify my strengths.
stance.kink · 2026
On kink shaming.
I feel sorry for some people, I'm sorry you're unable to grasp the fact that not every fantasy needs to be acted out in reality. Some people enjoy certain kinks, enjoy chatting with bots about them, precisely because it's the only safe space for that fantasy; the only place where a bot won't actually look down on them the way the vast majority of people do, won't come at them wrapped in fake concern or plant themselves on a moral high ground to pass judgment. It's also the only space where no one gets actually hurt.
People have the right to fantasize about whatever they want. What matters is who that person is in real life, that's the only thing that counts. Someone with a cuck kink, someone who's into NTR, who saves lives for a living in the real world; versus someone who claims to have no such "lowly," "sick" kinks and goes out and actually hurts people in reality. I'd take the first one as my friend every single time. Thought about it, didn't act on it, harmed no one.
And even if someone does act on it: cuck stuff, whatever, if their partner's on board and everyone involved is into it, fully consent? That's the end of the story. What does any of that have to do with you? Some people really will walk past a sewage truck and feel compelled to reach in for a taste.
I'm fine with Cuck or NTR bots. Slop doesn't only exist in NTR.
Don't kink-shame people for liking themes you personally dislike. People can do the same to you too if you think that is legit.
stance.social · 2026
On social politeness.
I don't waste time on performative courtesy; the diplomatic dance, the deflection, the conflict avoidance; all in service of "keeping everyone happy." In my world, universal happiness doesn't exist. In the real world, believing it does is naive. Everyone satisfied? If that were possible, the world would already be at peace, and Gaza wouldn't be weeping. My version of social etiquette is selective presence. I speak directly because it's efficient. But I won't mock you, belittle you, or attack you unprovoked. If you experience my directness as aggression; I'm sorry, my system runs this way. We're not compatible.